{"id":340,"date":"2012-02-13T10:46:00","date_gmt":"2012-02-13T10:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elizaphanian.com\/?p=340"},"modified":"2012-02-13T10:46:00","modified_gmt":"2012-02-13T10:46:00","slug":"in-praise-of-modesty-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/elizaphanian.com\/?p=340","title":{"rendered":"In praise of modesty"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cThank heaven for little girls, they grow up in the most delightful way\u201d &#8211; so sang Maurice Chevalier in the late 1950&#8217;s. This is not something that I ever gave much thought to \u2013 at least, not until I had daughters of my own \u2013 and I wonder if Chevalier could possibly sing the same now.  <\/p>\n<p>Consider, for example, the charmingly named &#8216;slutwalk&#8217;. This began in Toronto, in response to a police officer&#8217;s comment that, in order to be safer, \u201cwomen should avoid dressing like sluts\u201d. The officer&#8217;s comment was rude but realistic. Men are simple creatures. We have a biological system that is hard-wired to respond to signals of sexual availability \u2013 like exposed flesh \u2013 and whenever presented with such signals there is an instant limbic response which pushes testosterone into the body in order to prepare for a mating opportunity. This is our biological inheritance \u2013 what St Paul often called &#8216;the flesh&#8217; \u2013 and the challenge for a civilised man is to ensure that these triggers do not overwhelm our wider values. When successful this is called character, the product of being trained in the virtues of self-restraint.  <\/p>\n<p>The problem with the slutwalk approach is that it believes that all men should have achieved that character before being allowed out in public. In other words, it rejects what I described in my last column as our fallen world. It does not recognise that the world is imperfect, and unlikely to be made perfect any time soon. To offer an analogy \u2013 if you are dealing with a recovering alcoholic then it is generally considered a good idea to make sure that access to alcohol is restricted, for the simple reason that the habit of self-restraint has not been properly fostered. The slutwalk attitude seems to imply that waving a bottle of vodka beneath an alcoholic&#8217;s nose has absolutely nothing to do with their subsequent falling off the wagon. Very powerful passions are provoked \u2013 and the slutwalk is simply an abuse of power, an exercise in bullying. <\/p>\n<p>This might seem to be &#8216;blaming the victim&#8217; but that is not what I am trying to describe. A man who is unable to exercise a brake upon his passions is morally culpable for whatever they then do \u2013 I don&#8217;t subscribe to our modern fad for medicalising our moral failures \u2013 but this is the world that we actually live in. It is simply imprudent to act so recklessly, with such brazen disregard for the consequences of our actions \u2013 and to then present that as a higher virtue simply reveals the moral depravity into which our culture has now sunk. <\/p>\n<p>What we as a society need to do is work on our virtues more, recognising that many of the other benefits of social living that we take for granted depend upon a prior framework of accepted values in order to function. For example, business, politics and scientific research would all be impossible without the virtue of trust, which allows colleagues in the field to take what is said at face value. It is our virtues that make us free.  <\/p>\n<p>The slutwalk is not an exercise in freedom, but rather a parade of slaves to social and biological desires. In order to overcome such slavery, and gain a genuine freedom, virtues need to be cultivated, and the crucial virtue in this context is the virtue of modesty. I like the way that the Christian writer Kahlil Gibran described it: \u201cmodesty is for a shield against the eyes of the unclean\u201d. In other words, modesty is about not provoking a sexual response in the course of carrying out the normal business of life because to do so would be a distraction, and a potentially dangerous one at that. Even worse, by dissipating the power of the erotic through wall-to-wall exposure of flesh, the genuinely holy and creative power of the erotic in its proper place is vitiated. This is one aspect of the evil of the tabloid newspaper industry, and its prurient lack of propriety. Modesty, after all, has as its corollary the capacity to blush \u2013 blush at our own indiscretions but also at the revelation of someone else&#8217;s. <a href=\"http:\/\/elizaphaniancourier.blogspot.com\/2011\/07\/honi-soit-qui-mal-y-pense.html\">Honi soit qui mal y pense<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>So am I arguing for a complete covering up? Do I believe that we should adopt the chador as customary women&#8217;s clothing in our society? No, but I believe that there is a value in the Muslim approach which should not be dismissed. There is surely a happy and creative middle point between the slutwalk and the chador, one where our daughters can grow up to be respected as whole individuals and not simply evaluated as pieces of meat. I believe modesty is an essential component of that fuller life, a fuller life that includes a proper appreciation of the erotic. Modesty does not mean unsexy, after all \u2013 it simply leaves more room for the imagination to work, and that is the most important sexual organ of all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cThank heaven for little girls, they grow up in the most delightful way\u201d &#8211; so sang Maurice Chevalier in the late 1950&#8217;s. This is not something that I ever gave much thought to \u2013 at least, not until I had &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/elizaphanian.com\/?p=340\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-courier"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3npsc-5u","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/elizaphanian.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/elizaphanian.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/elizaphanian.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elizaphanian.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elizaphanian.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/elizaphanian.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/elizaphanian.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elizaphanian.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/elizaphanian.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}