World denial

Just a thought – as yet unformed, but I wanted to acknowledge and record it.

Pacifism – resolute non-violence – rests on the refusal to act in a way which is sinful (that a violent action is sinful is not disputed).

The church’s role is to cultivation and form disciples in such a way that this becomes second nature, that it governs the way that they think about these things.

Sometimes the consequences of acting in this sin-less manner (or less sinful manner) is that great harm is achieved within the world by those who have chosen violence. World War II is the classic example. Non-violent resistance did not/ would not dissuade the Nazis.

There is, therefore, a claim implicitly being made here, that the ‘eternal’ consequences justify the temporal costs.

This, it seems to me, is a form of world-denial. I am not sure how to reconcile this with an incarnational faith.

The shape of the world in 2050

This is just a short one, despite the grandiose title.

One of the things about a) Peak Oil (therefore Peak energy) and b) Global Warming, is that the energy structure of the future will necessarily be more diffuse and multiform (and more efficient and lower in carbon). There probably will still be a ‘grid’ of sorts, but it won’t dominate electricity supply in the way it does now. The pattern will have much more resemblance to the internet, especially the ‘Napster’ model, with many nodes sharing product and lots of redundancy built in. The local will be the dominant factor. (And I remain convinced that the future is wiredwhat will Google do? etc)

I’m reminded to say this by this article, and the concept of systempunkt. In other words, as well as the pressures on the system coming from Peak Oil and Global Warming, we can add Global Guerrillas as another major force dictating the same outcome.

Fortunately, this outcome is deeply attractive and human.

Illness

Now – I tend to believe that most illness is psychosomatic (voice of a sergeant major in the background “Pull yourself together boy!”), which means that whenever I get ill my main project is to ask myself ‘why?’.

Actually, this isn’t as neurotic as it might seem(!). I think this time, which was the first ‘proper’ illness I’ve had since coming to Mersea, was simply God saying ‘take a break’, or, more precisely, ‘let go’. The key shift was pulling out of the Learning Church and the Remembrance service (which I should now be preparing to take, rather than writing this blog entry – but then, I do think that ‘should’ is the language of Satan). It was learning, again, the lesson that nobody is indispensable – and that it is OK to disengage. Which meant that when I finally stopped fighting it and trying to get myself back into the saddle for the weekend – and wrapped myself up in a duvet for 48 hours without trying to do anything else significant – the illness finally started to shift. Still there to some extent – especially a pain in my lungs/ sore throat – but the lethargy has gone. Mostly.

I think I might look back on this (especially as I’m due to go on retreat next week) as a time of transition – the beginning at Mersea is well and truly over. Only a few weeks ago I felt myself start to relax and think ‘yes, this is going OK’ – and I’m sure it is precisely that relaxation somewhere in my soul which allowed this illness to get a foothold. Let God, and all that.

Various things have started to clarify though – and there is a lot that I want to write about. Stay tuned!

A less amusing train of thought

Despite loving Colbert, and appreciating all that he does, I do see a dark side to all this.

(Well, I would, wouldn’t I?)

OK. Put together this, with this:

America will never get over Vietnam. It’s doomed to fight wars in a cyclic fashion until some dreadful world crisis forces an extension of its periodicity to decisive victory. 9/11 wasn’t big enough for that. Fairly soon but with increasing speed the consequences of this catastrophic collapse will be felt and the pendulum will swing back, maybe in 2008, maybe in 2010 — but not all the way — and a new Rumsfeld will be found only to be trashed by a new Pelosi. Back and forth it will go. The next decade will be littered with the bones of millions of indigenes caught up in the betrayals of American domestic politics. Remember the words “Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.” The man who said those words was dead within three years of uttering them, together with millions of Indochinese, many drowned in the South China Sea. The cycle will continue until some catastrophe breaks the cycle or breaks America.


and this, with explanation of the story here:.

Could it be that a lone survivor of the 20th Century’s death camps at Auschwitz or Bergen Belsen could have looked back upon the chances the allies had to squelch Hitler’s ambitions in 1935 or 1937 or 1938, before the Nazis had the strength to drag all of Europe into its nightmare darkness with them, and wished that France and England had showed more ruthlessness in the beginning, when the death toll would have been in the thousands rather than the tens of millions? Could the Time Traveler’s reading of Thucydides be based on witnessing even more pain and destruction than even our hypothetical survivor of the 20th Century’s death camps and dislocations?

In Kaplan’s Warrior Politics , it is not ruthlessness that is being sought after, but the pagan virtues of clear-seeing…of seeing that good and evil are usually false dichotomies and that continued passive tolerance of intolerance equals intolerance, if not actual self-defeat.

I say this even though I am convinced (having watched this, and linked it in to various other elements we should be aware of) that the specific ‘terrorist’ threat to the Western world is vastly overblown, and not much more than propaganda. However, what our wise leaders have conjured up is a malevolent genie – and this genie happens to have a weapon to hand that will destroy our way of life. It won’t destroy humanity, and it won’t destroy western civilisation, but it will cause havoc, and probably lead to the destruction of Islamic civilisation. Our endeavours should be focussed upon minimising the blowback.