Feed reading

Since discovering the blogosphere I’ve been using Awasu to follow things. But I hate it – it must win a prize for the most annoying piece of software. So I finally took the plunge and I’ve spent the past half hour shifting my feeds (forty or so) onto the Sage plug-in (for Firefox, and if you’re not using Firefox… er, why not? If somebody gave you a ten pound note and said ‘here’s a tenner, you’re life will be better’ would you say no? even after exhausting all potential paranoia?)

Anyhow. Sage is really good. I’ve only been using it for ten minutes, but the best thing about it is that I can now read the feeds as they are written and displayed on the blog page, not just the text. Which definitely makes a difference for some.

I also downloaded the ‘just blog it’ add-on, which I’m about to start experimenting with…..

In the pipe

When I was a kid I used to really enjoy reading war comics, like Victor and Battle Action. There was one story that appeared in a collection (possibly a ‘Commando’ half size) called ‘In the Pipe’.

The story went like this…

Our brave tommy hero is with his fellow soldiers pinned down by gunfire from an advancing German troop. They are on one side of a clearing in a wood; our boys are on the other. The trouble is that our boys are running out of ammo. Fortunately, the leader of the german troop is a complete coward. He keeps ordering some of his men to attack, who are then cut down by the British guns. But eventually the Brits run out of ammunition.

Our boys are close enough to be able to hear what is going on on the German side, and they pick up the idea that the German leader is unpleasant and unpopular. Then our brave tommy hero has the idea – maybe one of his comrades was shot when he still had a bullet ‘in the pipe’ – so he searches through the guns of his fellow soldiers until he finds a bullet – the last bullet that the Brits have.

Meanwhile, the German troop leader sees that the Brits have stopped firing, and thinks that they have run out of ammunition – giving him the ‘courage’ to lead an attack himself. So he strides out into the clearing at the head of his troops – and our brave tommy hero shoots him dead with the last bullet.

The German second-in-command (a corporal I guess) says to the rest of his troop ‘that’s enough fighting for one day’ – and so our brave tommy hero lives to fight another day.

~~~

I wasn’t planning to say much about the story. It’s just that it’s been on my mind a bit recently, because after the great dislocation, there will be an awful lot of ‘inventory’ lying around waiting to be used. So those communities that remain will have sufficient resources to keep elements of civilisation – like blogging – going for quite a while. We won’t be able to build lots of new computers. But there will be lots of old computers lying around waiting to be cannibalised for spare parts….

Love the machine

Just finished watching series one of Battlestar Galactica. I’m impressed. Much more going on than I was expecting, particuarly in the sphere of theology. I’m intrigued to see where they go with the ‘love of god’ theme, which seems to be playing a great part in the plot.

It is reminding me of two things. The first is the Matrix trilogy, and the peace made between the matrix and humanity. The second is Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance – that the Buddha is found in the pistons of an engine just as easily as in the flowers of a lotus petal.

In other words, I think there is a message here, coming through the collective unconscious, prompted by the Holy Spirit, about a reconciliation between humanity and technology, in order to move forward.

Having also finished book three of my ‘Peak Oil’ collection (full discussion tomorrow) the future survivability of human civilisation is on my mind.

“We are waiting not for a Godot, but for another – doubtless very different – St Benedict”

David is our leader!

Well, the next leader of the conservative party will be called ‘David’ – whether that implies ‘our’ for you will depend on far too many things for a blog subject line.

I’m glad Cameron is doing well. He speaks my language, and – if I were a member of the conservative party – I’m sure I’d vote for him rather than Davis. I’d have preferred to see a Cameron – Fox fight though, would have been a choice between two positives. Davis is just IDS with a sten gun (or SA80, whatever they have these days).

Interesting set of articles at the Guardian which Cameron wrote when he was just becoming an MP. See this one in particular – great quote, “if you cannot control the agenda in a leadership campaign, what chance have do you have when it comes to the real thing?”

My political affiliations have wandered during my lifetime. Grew up as a card carrying conservative – even ran in a mock election at my school in 1987 wearing a blue ‘I love Maggie’ rosette – but then went deeply green, and briefly became a member of the Liberal Democrats. My politics now are a deep turquoise – I don’t like the state, hate it in fact, but the green agenda requires a certain amount of state action. And I am convinced that the denudation of social capital requires a response, reaffirming much of the ‘traditionalist’ agenda – but nothing like what ‘Conservatism’ in the UK has looked like for the past twenty years. I like reading Peter Hitchens and Melanie Phillips, but I also like Timothy Garton Ash whose book ‘Free World’ I thought was excellent. I also like Noam Chomsky and I’m a ZNet (paid up) supporter…. In the US I’d definitely be a Republican, but I think the ‘Religious Right’ are neither. I don’t put much faith in any political platform – bit of an end to independent thought if you have to sign up to a party slate – which is why my initial ambition of becoming a politician was doomed to fail – I like nuance just a little too much to be a politician. But I remain fascinated with power and it’s working out.

And I shocked a friend the other night by saying that the English will never vote for Gordon Brown, simply because he is Scottish…..

Oh yes. I’d love to see a Giuliani v Clinton fight in 08. I’d vote for Rudi, but it would clarify a few things. Rudi has proved himself. Hillary? Yeah, right, uh huh.

Is it possible to be a libertarian traditionalist? (Only in the Anglosphere…..)

But I wanted to be River

I’m about five episodes into ‘Firefly’ at the moment…..

You scored as The Operative. You are dedicated to your job and very good at what you do. You’ve done some very bad things, but they had to be done. You don’t expect to go to heaven, but that is a sacrifice you’ve made for a better future for all.

The Operative

94%

Capt. Mal Reynolds

88%

Inara Serra

88%

River Tam

75%

Zoe Alleyne Washburne

75%

Simon Tam

75%

Shepherd Derrial Book

63%

Kaylee Frye

50%

Jayne Cobb

31%

Hoban ‘Wash’ Washburne

31%

Which Serenity character are you?
created with QuizFarm.com