
Nice guy; not quite up to the job. The book is an interesting read but I think he might have missed his calling.
Category Archives: politics
On that peace prize thing…
Sam to dearly beloved: did you hear that Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize?
Dearly beloved: For…?
Sam: well that’s the question, isn’t it?!
Strange that something so honourable can end up demeaning both parties. If Obama was Roman Catholic then beatitude might be possible, but as he isn’t, is there anywhere else left to go? I fear that after this, everything will be downhill and anti-climax. Is Nemesis ever merciful?
(Sorry if this comes across as excessively cynical and snarky. I’m genuinely baffled.)
On wanting to preserve the BBC

You might have noticed that I’m a bit right-wing (there’s a clue beneath the blog-title). The nature of my right-wingness is, at core, two-fold: i) I detest and distrust the state, indeed any over-mighty Leviathan (including big businesses), and I think that a diverse ecology of power is essential for a healthy society (Burke’s small platoons), and ii) I think the present form of over-mighty states have progressively dismantled the social virtues that are essential to human interaction and we’ve been ruing the consequences for at least two generations (principally, on this latter, I have in mind the undermining of any notion of personal responsibility).
Now the BBC, in terms of its reporting style, is resolutely of the left-wing Guardian reading establishment, and tends to support causes that run against those principles. So why might I think it worth preserving?
Well, in one sense, it simply IS one of Burke’s small platoons. It is part of our body politic, by now well established and ensconced in British society (and world society come to that). Furthermore, in an environment where there is always pressure to race to the bottom, the founding principles of the BBC (Reithianism) are more and more conservative. Of course, the BBC doesn’t always, or perhaps even often, live up to those principles, but they are there in the DNA, so there is always hope. There is much in the BBC that I would like to see reformed, especially to do with the news coverage but then I ponder the alternatives…
It would be totally the wrong time to try and radically change the BBC’s pattern of life. It is poised to become even more important worldwide in that it has a degree of depth in its news coverage, in the UK and worldwide, which commercial organisations simply cannot compete with (ha ha Mr Murdoch jr). And as newspapers decline in influence I think the BBC has quite a rosy future.
The thing is, I use the BBC in all sorts of ways – it is my home page when I turn on the internet; I am inducting my eldest into the joys of Doctor Who (we’ve just met the cybermen for the first time); and I’d still much rather watch sport on the BBC than any other channel (though the actual football coverage on Sky is pretty good). So: I’d like to see it preserved and I don’t feel too bad about paying the license fee, even though it’s basically a tax.
For all the ways in which it frequently infuriates me, I’m glad we’ve got the BBC and I think it is something that we can be proud of. May it live long and prosper!
PS This is yet another example of why I hate the state.
PPS and this is what I think we have to avoid!!
TBTE20090926
Some possibly controversial posts:
The dog ate global warming
It’s all the Palestinians own fault
Obama is a narcissist (in the non-technical sense)
Amateur hour at the White House
What is Christianity for?
On disagreeing with Mrs Palin
Sarah Palin has an op-ed piece in the Washington Post here. It would be fair to say that she hasn’t ‘got it’ about the need to abandon growth. If I’m right that she is basically a pragmatist, then she will.
Now, as this isn’t really a Palin-centric blog, I’ll shut up about her again for a while.
TBTM20090713
Go Sarah!

I wasn’t going to comment on this, but….
The other day my therapist told me I was “different”. Obviously everyone is different, and he did say – reassuringly explicitly – that I wasn’t “different” in the sense of being dysfunctional (along the lines of, eg, crack addicts or something like that); another thing that my therapist said is that I’m not someone who needs therapy, I just want to grow as a person. It put me in mind of a comment from a friend in church about the recent unpleasantness in the parish (on which topic I might write something before too long – in brief, as it is no longer in any way a secret, I asked the Director of Music here to retire) who wrote to me – objecting to what I’d done – but did so in a really nice way, listing my various eccentricities, such as growing a ponytail and taking a service whilst wearing a Hawaiian shirt. That’s what the therapist had in mind – I’m an eccentric. Which is fine, I probably am.
I think that one of the reasons why people find me a bit eccentric is that, to borrow the cliche, I march to the sound of a different drum. I would say (I would wouldn’t I?) that I’m trying, more or less successfully, to follow what God is telling me to do, and that, inevitably, leads to conflict with the consensus of a particular community – any community. I also suspect that I’m keener on the truth – possibly to a pathological degree – than is comfortable for most people. (I should add that sometimes my pursuit of truth is a tilting at windmills; one example would be the 9/11 truth movement which I spent some time having sympathy for, but mostly don’t any more. Thing is, having explored the issue in a great deal of depth I end up in a place which is much more solidly grounded than before, even if where I end up is basically where conventional opinion is – to leave a place and return and know it for the first time – but that’s what happens when you grow.)
So, all that is by way of preamble, and why I mention it is because of all the crap that is being hurled at Palin over her decision to resign from being Governor – which is, of course, not much changed from all the crap that has been sent her way for most of the last year. She is marching to the sound of her own drum, she is an independent eccentric and it scares the willies out of conventional consensus opinion – because she has the capacity to be a game changer. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
She said “Energy independence and national security, fiscal restraint, smaller government, and local control have been my priorities and will remain my priorities.” That’s a genuinely conservative statement of principles – and a statement of genuinely conservative principles which I’d support. In the context of the utter FUBAR of Obama’s economic policies I can well imagine her becoming the head of a revolutionary movement that takes her into higher reaches of power, not least given the three years of mounting disaster that the US will endure in the meantime. But maybe that’s just me tilting at windmills again.
Anyhow, I recognise, respect and admire her independence of character. Even if she never runs for political office again (and I wouldn’t blame her for making that decision): Go Sarah!
Is the BNP racist? (British National Party)
Which immediately brings to mind ‘is the Pope a Catholic?’ and ‘does a bear…’ and so on.
I’m sticking this up to point people to this site, which gives a reasoned answer to the question ‘is the BNP racist?’. I’d recommend all those wanting to squeeze the BNP do the same on their site.
(h/t Matt Wardman)
For what it’s worth, I think there is only one race – human. I also think that the BNP flourishes in part because a healthy and generous sense of English identity is suppressed. What is thirsty will drink of stagnant water if fresh supplies are denied. We need our roots:
Seed, bud, flower, fruit
Never gonna grow without their roots
Branch, stem, shoot
We need roots
Haul away boys, let them go
Out in the wind and the rain and snow
We’ve lost more than we’ll ever know
‘Round the rocky shores of England
We need roots…
TBTM20090429

If this is true I’d be a) delighted, b) surprised, and c) prepared to look at Obama in a whole new light.


