I have to say, I think I’d really enjoy a conversation with Prof Dawkins.
(HT Stephen Law)
I have to say, I think I’d really enjoy a conversation with Prof Dawkins.
(HT Stephen Law)
“The first and foremost doctrine de scriptura is therefore not a proposition about scripture at all. It is rather liturgical and devotional instruction: Let the Scripture be sung, at every opportunity and with care for its actual address to hearers even if these are only the singer. The churches most faithful to Scripture are not those that legislate the most honorific propositions about Scripture but those that most often and thoughtfully sing and listen to it.”
(found here)
Notes for the house groups on 1 Corinthians.
Week eight, beginning Sunday 15 July: 1 Corinthians 9.1-23
Main themes: The rights of an apostle
Paying ministers
Click ‘full post’ for text
Questions to prompt discussion
1.What is an apostle? What are their rights and duties?
2.Which Christian ministers should be paid for their work? Why? What issues does this raise in terms of ‘clericalisation’ (what Rev Sam calls the ‘George Herbert model’)?
3.Is language of ‘human rights’ Christian language? Should Christians use that language, or does it embody secular assumptions about who we are as creatures?
4.What does Paul’s teaching in vv19-23 tell us about mission? In terms of the practices of our church, what do we need to hang on to, and what is open to change, in order that ‘by all means [we] might save some’?
Supplementary thoughts:
The Corinthian church clearly contained elements who rejected Paul’s authority, and here – as in chapters 3 and 4 – Paul is asserting his apostolic credentials and identity. Bear in mind the wider context of the argument that Paul is having with the Corinthians, where there is some sense of spiritual elitism. Paul asserts his “highest rights” – but in order to emphasise the importance of service and submission. Paul is trying to undercut the spiritual arrogance of the leaders of the Corinthian church (directly continuing the point of ch 8).
Paul emphasises that he is under a compulsion to preach the gospel, and that being paid for it would undermine his preaching. This may be because it would fit into the cultural expectations in places like Corinth, where there was a tradition of itinerant philosophers being paid for their teaching, and where manual labour was looked down upon.
Notes on verses
v 5 – note that clerical celibacy is unknown! (Celibate clergy are a medieval innovation)
vv 9-11 one of only two examples where Paul uses allegory (the other is Gal 4.21-31)
v 10 – a quotation from Ecclesiasticus, part of the apocrypha, which Paul saw as ‘Scripture’, ‘this was written for us’.
v 14 – compare Matthew 10.10 and Luke 10.7
v 20 -21 – see Galatians 3 (indeed, all of Galatians!)
Just an advance notice that on Wednesday morning I’m due to be interviewed (for an hour!) on Premier Christian radio, between 9 and 10am, British Summer Time. You should be able to listen to it on-line whilst it’s happening (go to that page and click the ‘listen now’ button).
If you’re interested, of course
On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
And Jesus said: why do you ask what you need to do? Eternal life is not a matter of “doing”, as if you could achieve salvation by your own efforts. You must believe the right things. If you desire eternal life, say this prayer with all sincerity “Dear Jesus, I admit that I am a sinner, deserving of Hell. Please forgive me of my sins and take me to Heaven when I die. I now believe upon You alone, apart from all works and religion, as my personal Savior. Thank you. Amen.”
I’m so glad He didn’t say that. And if you think this unreal, go here.
This one looks promising
This one for the special effects and such like
This one has assembled a good cast if nothing else
Potential to be a classic sf film:
And finally this one might be really cool.
Of course, these are just the low-brow ones. I’m a boy. I like explosions.